April 2026

Power Digital
Marketing

Year two with Apollo: what is ready to compound.

Renewal
June 2, 2026
Apollo
Kerri Ann Fahey
Allan Cheow
Prepared for
Justin Wells
Marco Caracappa
Jessica Caraker
Where we are

22 months in, Apollo is running your outbound engine at power-user scale.

Every conversation in this deck starts from that. Not theoretical. Measured.

Active Sequences 49 Industry baseline: 2-3 per rep
Contacts L60D 312,378 Into sequence, not bulk blast
All-time Emails 285,957 Through mailbox rotation + warmup
All-time Dials 576,619 273 meetings set across program
Days active L30 29/30 Daily habitual team use
Fusepoint on Apollo Live Sub-brand built on workflow core

Read: your team runs more automation, sends more cleanly, and shows up in Apollo more consistently than most mid-market customers. What compounds from here is a question of which layer we turn on next, not whether the foundation works.

What is ready to compound

The AI layer is inside Apollo already. Feed it context, it sharpens the next thousand outputs.

Apr 13 this year, one person on your team activated the AI Research feature trial. That is the signal we are building on. Every AI capability inside Apollo (Research, Sequence Writing, Email Composer, Assistant, Pre-Meeting, Call Summaries, Custom Filters) reads from one shared place: the AI Context Center.

Today that center is empty. Every AI output is written in Apollo default voice, not Power Digital voice. Closing that one gap sharpens seven features at once.

Setup cost: one working session Feature count: seven Reversible: yes

Context Center feeds seven features

AI Sequence WritingVoice
AI Email ComposerVoice
AI AssistantProducts
AI Research briefsFrame
AI Pre-Meeting InsightsPain
AI Call SummariesCTAs
AI Custom FiltersICP
Play 01

Dialer trial evaluation framework.

Marco already turned on the Apollo dialer trial. This is the structure that turns it into a 2-week evaluation: connect rate, SFDC sync parity, and workflow trigger coverage measured side-by-side with what you run today. Zero workflow change during the trial. If the data says keep both, the data says keep both.

Owner: Marco Window: 2 weeks Risk: zero
01
Pick the cohort. 5 SDRs from Marco's team, already running dials daily.
02
Define the eval. Connect rate, SFDC activity log parity, workflow trigger coverage. Marco writes the criteria, Apollo supplies the baseline.
03
Run parallel. Apollo dialer + current dialer for 14 days, same cohort. No process change.
04
Read out. End of week 2: Marco + Kerri Ann + Allan review data, not opinions.
05
Decide. Keep current. Standardize Apollo. Run both. You drive.

What's already unique on the Apollo side: every dial writes the call log, recording URL, and disposition into the SFDC Activity object on the right Contact and Opportunity with no separate sync job. That is the piece you stop managing the day you standardize.

Play 02

Contact-level website visitor tracking.

Your inbound surface already runs Chili Piper and Clay. This adds a third signal layer: the visitor is identified at the contact level, not just the company level. That contact routes into SFDC with ownership and next-step routing already assigned. It works alongside what you have. It does not replace it.

Pairs with: Diego's current eval Window: 1 demo Inbound-ready
01
Share your routing targets. Diego's existing account list + qualification rules.
02
Run the contact-level demo. Apollo identifies the visitor as a named contact, not a company string.
03
Show the SFDC flow. Contact lands with owner assigned + persona tagged + qualification score.
04
Chili Piper picks it up. Scheduling happens where it already happens. No displacement.
Play 03 . Trial active

AI Research + live lead scoring.

Apr 13 your team activated AI Research inside Apollo. This is the 2-week structured rollout: which 5 reps, which 50 accounts, which persona definitions feed the Context Center, and how the scoring output shows up in the inbound + outbound routing Marco already runs.

Already activated 5 reps, 50 accounts Context-driven
01
Identify the activator. The user who turned on AI Research Apr 13 has the first hands-on read.
02
Extend to 4 more SDRs. Same Marco cohort. Apollo provides free AI Research trial credits per user.
03
Populate Context Center. Value prop, personas, ICP, pain points. One working session.
04
Train a scoring model. Apollo AI Lead Scoring reads your SFDC closed-won history.
05
Route by score. Threshold 70+ contacts flow into sequences first. Everything else holds.
Play 04

Apollo CI as pre-stage 2 complement to Gong.

Gong owns your forecasting and full-call intelligence. Apollo CI proposes to run on the pre-stage-2 window only, the discovery-to-demo surface, and pull repeatable objections and unanswered questions out of those calls. That output goes back into Apollo sequence variants. Two different surfaces. Two different call cohorts. No overlap.

Gong stays for forecast 50 calls (10 reps x 5) Sequence-feedback loop
01
Scope the surface. Pre-stage 2 only: discovery to demo transitions.
02
Pilot on 50 calls. 5 reps x 10 discovery calls each. Existing recording infra.
03
Extract the pattern. Top 3 objections, top 3 unanswered questions, weekly.
04
Feed sequences. New variant targets same persona with the exact objection-handling Apollo extracted.
Play 05

Workflow engine + signal triggers.

Marco and Jessica already think in terms of automation. Apollo's workflow builder lets you turn signals (form abandon, job change detected, intent spike, website visit) into actions (enrich, sequence enroll, Slack notify, SFDC task) without engineering tickets. Three workflows. Two weeks. Measured impact on rep time-to-first-touch.

Owners: Marco + Jessica 3 workflows in 2 weeks No engineering
01
Pick three processes worth automating. Whatever costs reps hours weekly today.
02
Workflow one: form abandon > contact-level identified > auto-enroll in re-engagement sequence.
03
Workflow two: job change detected > enrich new company > sequence + Slack notify owner.
04
Workflow three: intent topic spike > score > route to correct rep > Slack ping.
05
Measure: median time from trigger to first rep action, week over week.
Play 06

If you keep your current dialer, Apollo gets smarter around it.

Your dialer choice does not need to change for Apollo to add value on every call. Two AI research layers plug in at the seams. Your rep keeps the tool they dial with today. Salesforce remains the single pane of truth.

Layer 01

Pre-call research brief

Before a call connects, Apollo AI generates a 5-minute-read brief on the prospect: recent news, signals, technographic fit, persona match, last-touch history from Salesforce. Delivered in the Chrome Extension sidebar on any web-based dialer surface your rep uses.

Context Center-fed SFDC-pivoted
Layer 02

Post-call AI summary

After the call ends, the recording URL (your current dialer's output) feeds Apollo AI. Back comes a decision + action-item summary, extracted next-step signals, and auto-populated SFDC custom fields on the Opportunity. Zero manual note-taking.

Webhook-triggered SFDC-writeback
Chrome Extension

Overlays any web surface your rep dials from.

SFDC bi-directional

Current dialer logs call, Apollo reads + enriches + writes back.

Workflow webhooks

End-of-call triggers enrichment + sequence actions automatically.

Testing framework

Your team runs the test. Not us.

Four weeks. Five reps. Two hundred contacts each. Each week adds one AI layer. Marco, Jessica, and Diego own the test design and the readout. Week 4 lands one week before renewal close. The data you present to Justin comes from your own sending, not our pitch.

Week 1 . Apr 28 - May 5

Baseline

Manual research, standard outreach. 1,000 contacts total. Reply rate + meeting-book + time-per-lead measured.

Week 2 . May 6 - 12

+ AI Research

AI Research brief on every contact. Same reps, same volume. Same measures.

Week 3 . May 13 - 19

+ AI Lead Scoring

Filter to scored 70+. Measure lift against baseline.

Week 4 . May 20 - 26

Full stack

AI Research + Lead Scoring + Personas. Compounded lift. Readout to Justin T-7.


Success looks like

  • 20% reply-rate lift over baseline
  • 50% time-per-lead reduction
  • Meetings from scored-high: 2x baseline cohort

If the data disappoints

Troubleshoot Context Center first, personas second, scoring model third. The AI is only as sharp as what it reads from. We rebuild with you mid-test.

What we propose
Pick two.
We build.
You tell us what works.

Six plays on the table. You pick two that fit your team's bandwidth and your renewal question. We build them alongside you in the next four weeks. You present the results to yourself and decide what compounds into year three.

01

Agree the two plays

30 min. Marco, Jessica, Justin, Kerri Ann, Allan.

02

Build + test for 4 weeks

We build alongside your team. Your team owns the readout.

03

Decide what compounds

Data in hand. Renewal conversation becomes a working conversation.